Catagorising your ratings.
Printed From: MetalMusicArchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.MetalMusicArchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4949
Printed Date: 29 Apr 2024 at 6:29am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 10.16 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Catagorising your ratings.
Posted By: renkls
Subject: Catagorising your ratings.
Date Posted: 16 Nov 2012 at 6:46pm
|
What would you describe each of your star ratings as being? For me:
0.5: Nothing redeemable or a joke album, CD serves better use as a coaster then for music. 1.0: Nothing close to representing listenability, or a very poorly constructed piece of work. 1.5: Not unredeemable, but will seldom be revisited, if ever. 2.0: Niche, probably fans only, but even then, probably pretty mediocre. 2.5: Divided opinion. Has some good, some bad, but decent overall. 3.0: Decent stuff, may revisit now and then. 3.5: A solid, enjoyable listen. Probably give it a spin monthly. 4.0: Excellent work, seldom a dull moment and well worth anyones time. 4.5: Close to the best, a few minor flaws withstanding. Innovative and unique. 5.0: Cream of the crop, masterpiece, magnum opus of audial ectasy. Genius from beginning to end. And yours? |
Replies:
Posted By: IMPF2112
Date Posted: 16 Nov 2012 at 7:36pm
|
In a word: 5.0 Dude 4.5 Amazing 4.0 Awesome 3.5 Great 3.0 Good 2.5 Alright 2.0 "Not Very Good" 1.5 Bad 1.0 Shit 0.5 Dude
|
Posted By: renkls
Date Posted: 16 Nov 2012 at 7:52pm
I suppose the emphasis on the 5.0 dude is more like 'Duuuuuuuuude!'
|
IMPF2112 wrote:Posted By: J-Man
Date Posted: 16 Nov 2012 at 9:00pm
|
5.0 - Absolute masterpiece and one of the greatest albums of its genre. 4.5 - Nearly perfect album that leaves me stunned every time I hear it. 4.0 - Great album that may be lacking in originality or consistency, but still excellent. 3.5 - Above average. Nothing essential, but worth hearing for fans of the respective genre. 3.0 - Average. While it's nothing special, the performances are solid and the songwriting is decent. 2.5 - A mediocre album that's plagued with a severe flaw or two. 2.0 - Not recommended except for die-hard fans. 1.5 - Apart from one or two redeeming qualities, this is pretty awful. 1.0 - A terrible album with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. 0.5 - Emmure. Of course, where I place an album is largely subjective, but I try to stick with this general guideline.  ------------- Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime" rel="nofollow - http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
Posted By: Kingcrimsonprog
Date Posted: 28 Nov 2012 at 3:18pm
|
Mine are generous. 5 - Good. Its good in general. 4 - Good. It is good for what it is. 3 - Good, I like it, but I can see its not good enough to get a higher rating. 2 - Bad. Its not merit-less but I just don't like it. 1 - There's some actual fault with it or its unauthorized. -------------  My Blog: http://kingcrimsonprog.wordpress.com/ |
Posted By: Kingcrimsonprog
Date Posted: 28 Nov 2012 at 3:20pm
Oh and .5s between each are 'I want to give it a higher rating, but don't want to get criticized for being too generous.'  ------------- My Blog: http://kingcrimsonprog.wordpress.com/ |
Posted By: Wilytank
Date Posted: 28 Nov 2012 at 3:41pm
|
5- Space Wolves/Orks 4.5- Black Templars/Chaos Space Marines 4- Imperial Guard/Tyranids 3.5- Blood Angels/Dark Eldar 3- Dark Angels/Eldar 2.5- Vanilla Marines 2- G(r)ay Knights 1.5- Tau 1- Chaos Daemons 0.5- Sisters of Battle I do believe that is all of them. ------------- 
|