Testament: Great thrash or tinny dirge? |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
The T 666
MMA Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: 30 Mar 2010 Location: Hell Status: Offline Points: 476 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I would never put Testament above any of the Big Four except Anthrax, which I find extremely weak. Slayer's best moments crush Testament's, and that multiplied by 100 with Megadeth and 1000 with Metallica. Even their best songs are just good thrash songs, only three or four are really little masterpieces ("Over the Wall")
|
|
|
|
NecronCommander
Forum Senior Member Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 79 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Testament, IMO, was the truest thrash metal band to have ever been formed. Although they did do some stuff with death metal, they never really strayed from their thrash roots, and I respect that a lot *coughmetallicacough*.
The only problem with Testament was that they were never really extraordinary to begin with. They were consistent all across the board, yes, but to that extent, a lot of their music was just sorta... meh. Good, but not great. Their standoff moments were few and far between, unlike their contemporaries Megadeth and still-then-thrash-Metallica, who had hit after hit with their discography. Granted, Testament still has their moments. The Formation of Damnation is one of my favorite thrash metal albums, and albums like The Gathering and Practice What You Preach are both excellent as well. |
|
Harry
Forum Groupie Joined: 31 Mar 2010 Location: Melbourne, Aus Status: Offline Points: 84 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Testament is just awesome IMO.
WAY better than Metallica when I average out their albums, and they had some serious muscle muscle with guys like Alex Skolnick in the band. Kirk Hammett may as well throw his guitars in the bin if he jammed with Skolnick |
|
|
|
FusionKing
Forum Senior Member Joined: 28 Mar 2010 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 327 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Still exploring the realms of Testament for now... but from what I've heard, thier older stuff is better. As for production, it's not something I care much about, it's the songs that matter to me.
|
|
UMUR
MMA Special Collaborator Errors & Omissions Team / Retired Admin Joined: 25 Mar 2010 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 18113 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I loved the debut and the second album is pretty good too, but none of their output is anywhere near as interested as the best output by Slayer, Metallica and Megadeth IMO.
|
|
MAVIIIVAM
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: 07 Apr 2010 Location: Lost Angeles Status: Offline Points: 486 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jesus . . .
How old are you "Kids" ? Come on, they were HUGE back in the day. the 1st 3 albums are classics, but put yourself back in that time. Not till "Obituary" did some figure out how to "mic" double bass drums to get the cuncussion out of them! Yes "Tinny" because Thrash was NEW and so was the engineering for it, who did they have to copy? These were among the 1st Thrashers to be more than fast, they were technical and were very good musicians. Like most of the originals, newer bands come along to "one-up" the previous bands and take the music to new hieghts, Production, Engineering and Technology finally catches up and even CRAPPY bands sound better (notice I say "sound" better). I give a lot of credit to them, Billy has gone through alot himself, almost dieing, having a Benifit Concert/ Metal Fest for him, that doubled for Schuldiner (The 2 "Chucks"), Alex Skolnick leaving to persue his Fusion/Prog needs for creativity, the Band breaking up, reforming . . . and still at it. I can think of a TON of Bands that are doing it for "Lifestyle Maintenance" or just sounding as shitty as ever. I do believe these guys are doing it for the Love of it. I dont think they were really "Aggro", because they always did solos (if I'm not mistaken), a bit more technical, and Chuck made the change to "sing" cookie vocals because it was the time and probably easier to sing that way (as he gets older). These among many others I need to get their catalogue, I think they are among the greats and many wouldnt be here if it wasnt for the "Big 20". Its just my opinion though . Edited by MAVIIIVAM - 23 Apr 2010 at 9:43pm |
|
"If you're happy to be an Ant in the Sand Box, you're welcome to it!" -Forbidden
For Progressive Metal and Prog Rock, come visit, request songs and explore at PrOgulus.com |
|
Phonebook Eater
MMA Metal Reviewer Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
TRASH!!!
|
|
DeathOfSeasons
Forum Senior Member Joined: 27 Mar 2010 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 112 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've never liked Testament. I haven't heard all of their albums but from what I have heard they sound pretty weak to me.
|
|
Pekka
MMA Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Location: Helsinki Status: Offline Points: 1356 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I really like the material on the early albums, the first three of them that I own, but the production is indeed pretty bad. Particularly the drum levels, loud as hell and obscuring the guitars. Live In London is a quite good album, early material with better sound, and The Gathering has some absolute killer material.
|
|
Stooge
MMA Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator/Retired Admin Joined: 25 Mar 2010 Location: Whitby, ON, CAN Status: Offline Points: 5637 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
They released some good albums thoughout their career. Very consistent output, though I don't know if they have any "essential" recordings. Haven't put much thought into it. My favorite album of theirs is probably Low. I don't listen to them much these days, and I can't get into their latest album. I just haven't been into thrash metal in general lately.
|
|
mosefus
Forum Newbie Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 25 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
A bit of both if you ask me.
You didn't, I know, but I'm spouting all the same. Suffering more than their peers, the Big Four in particular, from a thin production on occasion (though Megadeth have never done it for me due to the very thin production and McStain's reed like vocals) these guys nevertheless hammered out decent thrash back in the eighties, though were oft overlooked. Reimagining themselves in the nineties as aggro-thrash of sorts, I'm just looking to get a consensus. Were they ever any good, or just a bunch of flash, fret 'wonking' sons of guns? |
|
http://www.smellthecult.com
http://www.smellthecult.blogspot.com Keep it metal and ye shall be wise |
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |