MetalMusicArchives.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home >Metal Music Lounges >Metal Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation >Post Reply
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Post Reply - should venom re record


Post Reply
Name:




Message:

Emoticons
Smile Tongue Wink
Cry Big smile LOL
Dead Embarrassed Confused
Clap Angry Ouch
Star Shocked Sleepy
more...
   NoFollow is applied to all links from this forum
 Enable BBcodes
Security Code:
Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code  Refresh Refresh Image
Powered by Web Wiz CAPTCHA version 4.03 wwf
Copyright ©2005-2013 Web Wiz
Please enter the Security Code exactly as shown in image format.
Cookies must be enabled on your web browser.

Message
Topic - should venom re record
Posted: 12 Feb 2013 at 9:39am By vmoore
Originally posted by Wilytank Wilytank wrote:

Originally posted by Stooge Stooge wrote:

I don't see why they shouldn't re-record old stuff.  Testament, Exodus, and Anthrax (among several others) have done it.

Except these re-recordings are no where near as praised as the originals.  In Exodus' case, there's been a lot negative feed back for Let There Be Blood.

Why fix what ain't broken?
right the re recordings didn't work for testament or anthrax because the original recordings didn't and still don't suck. but re recordings of old albums would work for venom because of the piss pore production quality is all i was getting at

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.16
Copyright ©2001-2013 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.130 seconds.